Webster defines abstract as: a.considered aside from a certain instance, b.expressing a good apart from the object or c. having only intrinsic form with minimum pictorial representation. Put simply; taking a thing and concentrating on its core fundamentalness. All three definitions very easily fit abstract painting in showing, telling, drawing and painting ab muscles essence of the item without actually depicting the item itself.
How does an abstract painter arrive at an abstract design? Many stated which they started with a representational motif, that the motif was something readily identifiable. Chances are they dissected the motif as they say, looking for the bare bones, ab muscles essence of the object. They expressed this essence with colorful shapes, some beautiful, some drab, and some just plain ugly.
In almost any painting the artist is making a statement. It’s easy to say pretty pink flowers in a representational painting. What the abstract artist has to say must certanly be said with his/her simple means; brush marks, color and interesting shapes. Also, since color is arbitrary, color are at the artist’s whim, and may or may not be pretty and has nothing related to the painting’s success https://joomlamarketingtips.com/large-abstract-paintings-painting-for-beginners/.
To produce a meaningful statement with out a recognizable subject is daunting. It’s not just a matter of simply looking and drawing. She or he must use each of their wiles to engage us in dialog making use of their art, being limited, or we ought to say, unlimited, with unrecognizable shapes and unrelated (to the object) color. The artist must interest and speak to the viewer through form and color.
A weak, wishy washy, pretty pink flower painting says, “Weak, wishy washy pretty pink flowers!” Bright, bold colors, without form and substance in an abstract painting says, “No form and no substance!” Neither painting is successful.
So….. here we stand facing the piece of art, having no knowledge of abstract art, its purpose and intention. We want to respond but we’re with out a clue. So, we hesitate facing the art work, we don’t understand what to say, we don’t respond to the colour or design, so, we leave saying, or at the least thinking, “That artist must certanly be nuts!” And wondering what the painting was all about. The thing that was its purpose? Was it good art or not?
There are some people who are of the opinion that the painting must certanly be representational to be good art. And if they can’t see every hair on the top and every leaf on the tree, then the art is not good. That simply is not true. You may prefer the see every hair but that’s certainly not a sign of good art.
What guidelines do we’ve in judging abstract paintings merits? The guidelines that representational painters must follow are the same for the abstract painter. The job should have readable values, color harmony and dominance, repetition with variety in shapes, colors and lines, all that concerns good art must also be in abstract art.
An accumulation of wild colors and shapes does not necessarily add up to good art in abstraction or representational art. A great abstract can be more challenging to pull off than representational art since the artist is counting on his imagination and intuition to create something meaningful and of value. (not necessarily monetary value)
In wanting to understand abstract (non-representational) art, approach it with the idea in your mind to simply appreciate what is before you. Sometimes the title can give us a hint in regards to what the painting is about. That helps. Then look and take note of how it affects you.
Does the colour speak for your requirements? Are you lifted up or cast down by the colour? You may have some a reaction to a bit of art work, it’ll move you in some way, perhaps little, perhaps a great deal. Identify what it is. Good art, whether abstract or representational, sets a mood, tells a tale, however subtle, intrigues and interests the viewer, and as such, each painting must certanly be appreciated alone merits.